2023 Impact Factor
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a prevalent liver disorder that encompasses conditions ranging from simple steatosis to hepatocellular carcinoma and affects a substantial portion of the global population (Hutchison
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an important regulator of glucose and lipid metabolism. Reduced AMPK activity is often associated with obesity and insulin resistance. However, AMPK activation counteracts obesity and enhances insulin sensitivity (Pollard
AMPK serves as a cellular energy sensor and becomes activated AMPK in response to an increase in the AMP:ATP ratio (Hardie, 2011). Additionally, several upstream regulators of AMPK have been identified, including liver kinase B1 (LKB1) (Shaw
In East Asia,
Atractylodin (Cat. HY-N0238-250MG) was procured from MCE (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA). To obtain the
The normal diet (ND; containing 24.5% protein, 13.1% fat, and 62.4% carbohydrates; Cat. 5053) and HFD (containing 20% protein, 60% fat, and 20% carbohydrates; Cat. D12492) were purchased from Lab Diet (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Research Diets (New Brunswick, NJ, USA), respectively. Polyethylene glycol 400 (Cat. 25322-68-3) was purchased from Duksan (Ansan, Korea). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; Cat. 3801698) reagents were purchased from Leica (Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). FUJI DRI-CHEM slides for GPT/ALT-P III (Cat. 3250), GOT/AST III (Cat. 3150), TG-P III (Cat. 1650), and TCHO-P III (Cat. 1450) assessments were obtained from FUJIFILM (Tokyo, Japan). The TRIzol reagent (15596018) was sourced from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). AccuPrep Universal RNA Extraction Kit (K-3140) was obtained from Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea). RQ1 RNase-free DNase (M6101) was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). The High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (4368814) was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Foster City, CA, USA). The ExcelTaqTM 2X Fast Q-PCR Master Mix (SYBR, TQ1210) was purchased from SMOBIO (Hsinchu, Taiwan).
The glucometer (Accu-Chek Instant) and appropriate test strips were purchased from Roche (Mannheim, Germany). The Ultra-Sensitive Mouse Insulin ELISA kit (Cat. 90080) was purchased from Crystal Chem (Downers Grove, IL, USA). D-glucose (Cat. GL3071) was purchased from GeorgiaChem (Suwanee, GA, USA). Insulin was purchased from Novo Nordisk (Bagsværd, Denmark). The saline solution was obtained from Huons, Inc. (Seongnam, Korea). 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Cat. 475989-1G) was obtained from Millipore (San Diego, CA, USA). The syringe filters (Cat. 17845-ACK) were sourced from Sartorius (Goettingen, Germany). DMEM/Low Glucose with L-Glutamine and Sodium Pyruvate (Cat. SH30021.01) and MEM/EBSS (Cat. SH30024.01) were purchased from HyClone (Logan, UT, USA). 0.5% Trypsin-EDTA (10X) was obtained from Gibco (New York, NY, USA).
Fetal bovine serum (Cat. 35-015-CV) was obtained from Corning (Glendale, AZ, USA). Penicillin/streptomycin (Cat. SV30010) was purchased from HyClone (Logan, UT, USA). T0901317 (Cat. 575310) was purchased from Millipore (Burlington, MA, USA). The phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Cat. P5726) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Furthermore, the protease inhibitor cocktail (535140) was purchased from Calbiochem (Darmstadt, Germany). The ECL reagent (RPN2106) was purchased from GE Healthcare (Buckinghamshire, UK). The p-AMPK (T172) (Cat. 2535S), AMPKα (Cat. 2532S), p-ACC (S9) (Cat. 3661S), and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) (Cat. 3662S) antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). The beta-actin antibody (Cat. A5441) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Seven-week-old male C57BL/6N mice were purchased from Orient Bio Corporation (Seongnam, Korea) and KOATECH Corporation (Pyeongtaek, Korea). The mice were housed in the Kangwon National University Animal Laboratory Center under controlled environmental conditions at 23 ± 2°C with a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle. After allowing the mice to acclimatize for 1 week, they were randomly allocated to different experimental groups. The mice were provided with either ND or HFD
In a separate experiment, the mice were orally administered atractylodin at doses of 5 or 10 mg/kg, or a vehicle, 5 days per week, after 8 weeks of HFD feeding. The groups in this experiment were designated as follows: Group 1, ND+Vehicle (n=8); Group 2, ND+Atractylodin 10 mg/kg (n=8); Group 3, HFD+Vehicle (n=8); Group 4, HFD+Atractylodin 5 mg/kg (n=8), and Group 5, HFD+Atractylodin 10 mg/kg (n=9).
After 4 weeks of drug administration, the mice were sacrificed.
Blood was collected from the retro-orbital plexus of the mice. Following a 30-min incubation at room temperature, the blood samples were centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 15 min at 20°C. The resulting supernatant was carefully transferred to fresh tubes to obtain the serum (Hong
Mouse tissues were fixed in 10% formalin for 2-3 days and subsequently processed into paraffin blocks using a tissue processor (TP1020, Leica). Tissue sections with a thickness of 4 μm were obtained using a microtome (RM2235, Leica) and mounted on glass slides for tissue staining. After deparaffinization, we performed H&E staining as previously reported (Yang
Frozen sections were obtained at –80°C and allowed to equilibrate at room temperature for 10-15 min. The frozen sections were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 5 min each and briefly immersed in 60% isopropanol/H2O for 1 min. After complete drying, the sections were exposed to an Oil Red O solution for 15 min at room temperature. Following staining, the sections were rinsed in 60% isopropanol. They were then washed in PBS for 5 min, followed by a 1-min counterstaining with hematoxylin. After a final wash in H2O, the sections were mounted with glycerol. The Oil Red O-positive area was measured using ImageJ software (Yang
The qRT-PCR procedure involved the homogenization of mouse liver tissues or HepG2 cells in 1 mL of TRIzol reagent. As previously reported, upon adding 200 μL of chloroform, the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 3 min and then subjected to centrifugation (Kim
Table 1 Primer sequences for qRT-PCR
Primer | Forward | Reverse |
---|---|---|
18s | AGTCCCTGCCCTTTGTACACA | CGATCCGAGGGCCTCACTA |
m | AACGTCACTTCCAGCTAGAC | CCACTAAGGTGCCTACAGAGC |
m | GAAGATGTCTTGGAGGGCTG | CGCAGCGAAAACAAGAATAA |
h | CGACATCGAAGACATGCTTCAG | GGAAGGCTTCAAGAGAGGAGC |
h | GACATCGTCCATTCGTTTGTG | CGGATCACCTTCTTGAGCTCC |
h | GCTGCTCGGATCACTAGTGAA | TTCTGCTATCAGTCTGTCCAG |
The glucose tolerance test (GTT) was carried out 2 weeks after the administration of
The insulin tolerance test (ITT) was conducted 2 weeks after atractylodin administration. Following a 6-h fasting period, the body weights and fasting blood glucose levels were measured. Then, 0.75 U/kg of insulin was administered intraperitoneally and blood glucose levels were assessed at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after insulin injection.
Immediately after dissecting liver tissues from the mice, the tissues were preserved in an RNA
The liver tissues were homogenized (or the cells were lysed) using a cell lysis buffer (containing 10 mM Tris-HCl pH, 7.1, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol, and 0.5% Triton X-100) with the addition of a phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and a protease inhibitor cocktail. After incubation on ice for 1 h, centrifugation was performed to obtain whole-cell lysates. For the nuclear fraction, NE-PERTM Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents were used according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The protein concentration was quantified using the Bradford assay. Subsequently, 20-35 μg of the protein was loaded onto an SDS-PAGE gel to separate proteins by their molecular weights. The separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween 20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline with Tween 20 (PBST) for 5 min and incubated with the primary antibody at 4°C overnight. On the following day, the membrane was incubated with the secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Protein bands were detected using an ECL reagent (Shin
The cells were initially seeded in a 6-well cell culture plate and serum-deprived overnight. Subsequently, the cells were treated with either atractylodin or
HepG2 cells were cultured in DMEM/Low Glucose with L-Glutamine and Sodium Pyruvate supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin and streptomycin. Subculturing of the HepG2 cells was performed every 2-3 days. The HepG2 cells were seeded in 96-well cell culture plates. Once the cells reached approximately 60% confluency, the serum was withdrawn overnight. The cells were then subjected to treatment with either
Ligand docking studies were performed using AutodockTools 1.5.7 (https://autodock.scripps.edu/). The docking model utilized the AMPK structure with ligands from the PDB entry 6E4U. Docking was conducted with a docking box size sufficient to encompass the binding site.
Statistical analysis of the experimental results was conducted using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1 software (GraphPad Software Inc., Boston, MA, USA). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Differences between the experimental groups were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s or Dunnett’s tests. The level of statistical significance was set at
To assess the effect of
Moreover, the administration of 30 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg, or 120 mg/kg of
Furthermore, the level of serum ALT, an indicator of liver damage, was lower in the HFD-fed mice treated with 30, 60, or 120 mg/kg of
Next, we assessed the effects of
Atractylodin is an important bioactive component of
Next, we determined the effect of atractylodin on insulin resistance. The fasting serum glucose and insulin levels were reduced in the HFD-fed, atractylodin-treated mice compared to the HFD-fed, vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 4A, 4B). The HOMA-IR value was notably decreased in the HFD-fed mice treated with 10 mg/kg atractylodin compared to the vehicle-treated group (Fig. 4C). In the HFD-fed mice, the glucose levels and AUC of the GTT were significantly decreased in the groups administered 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg of atractylodin compared to the vehicle-treated group (Fig. 4D). Additionally, the ITT revealed a substantial improvement in the insulin sensitivity in the HFD-fed mice treated with atractylodin compared to that in the HFD-fed, vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 4E). These data suggest that atractylodin efficiently reduced insulin resistance. Next, we conducted an RNA-sequencing analysis using liver samples from HFD-fed mice treated with either the vehicle or 10 mg/kg of atractylodin. PCA revealed significant differences in gene expression patterns between the two groups (Fig. 4F). RNA-seq analysis of genes involved in the glucose metabolism revealed that atractylodin treatment increased the expression of glycolysis-related genes including
To identify the differential gene expression patterns between vehicle-treated and atractylodin-treated groups and understand the role of atractylodin in biological processes, we further analyzed RNA-seq data. The volcano plot displayed the distribution of the differentially expressed genes between the vehicle-treated and atractylodin-treated groups. Notably, atractylodin administration resulted in the downregulation of lipogenic genes, including
Gene Ontology (GO) biological process analysis of the major signaling pathways was conducted using the DAVID bioinformatics database (Fig. 5B). Among the TOP10 significantly altered GO terms, it was evident that lipid metabolism, lipid biosynthesis, fatty acid metabolism, and fatty acid biosynthesis were significantly modulated in the livers of mice treated with atractylodin compared to those treated with the vehicle. We then analyzed the significantly enriched GO terms using the GO BP Direct database (Fig. 5C). The lipid metabolic processes exhibited the highest numbers of up-regulated and down-regulated genes. The heatmap revealed that atractylodin treatment led to a decrease in the expression of numerous genes associated with lipid synthesis, whereas genes regulated by PPARα, such as
AMPK is a crucial regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism (Cool
To investigate whether
LXRα is a key transcription factor that regulates SREBP1c, a protein with a major role in hepatic
We further explored whether the inhibition of SREBP1c by atractylodin was mediated via AMPK activation. Notably, the ability of atractylodin to suppress T090-induced
The global prevalence of MASLD is rapidly increasing due to factors such as HFD-associated obesity, sugar consumption, and reduced physical activity. It is more prevalent in Western Pacific region, Southeast Asia and America, and its risk factors include obesity and elevated triglyceride levels (Tang
Atractylodin is often present in
A previous study highlighted the inhibitory effect of
Our findings indicated that atractylodin treatment significantly reduced HFD-induced obesity, fatty liver, and insulin resistance, similar to the effects of
In the present study, we found that atractylodin activated the AMPK signaling pathway (Fig. 6). AMPK is a serine/threonine protein kinase that acts as a critical energy sensor for cellular metabolism (Hwahng
Numerous genetic and pharmacological studies have consistently emphasized the pivotal role of AMPK in maintaining glucose homeostasis. In the liver, AMPK exerts its influence by inhibiting the expression of gluconeogenic genes, such as PEPCK and G6Pase (Cool
In summary, the results of this study demonstrate that both
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2022R1G1A1003601 to S.B.Y. and RS-2023-00210489, RS-2023-00301850 to Y.M.Y.). This research was supported by Korean Fund for Regenerative Medicine (KFRM) funded by Ministry of Science and ICT, and Ministry of Health & Welfare (RS-2022-00070363 to Y.M.Y.). This research was supported by Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2022R1A6C101A739).
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
G.Y.S., S-B.Y., and Y.M.Y. conceived the project and designed the research. G.Y.S., S.M.K., and Y.M.Y. performed the studies, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. S.B. performed the molecular docking analysis. S-B.Y. and Y.M.Y. provided administrative support and obtained funding. Y.M.Y. supervised overall data.